-> -> ->

DUSD Publishes Draft Budget Reductions

money-useThe Dublin Unified School District just published the draft budget reductions for next year. For a complete description along with impacts on personnel and plans for reintroduction, please go to the source data.

The reductions have been placed in five groups to aid the Board members in recommending implementation and reinstatement. The State cash flow problems are going to impact the DUSD budget for next year, the question is how much. $2.1 million is a number (after credits for additional revenue and expected staff attrition) that has frequently appeared in the last few weeks. Therefore, the Board will probably be forced to choose at least four of the five groups presented below and may want to adopt all five to allow for uncertainty in the State budget process. It does appear that for the most part the District listened to parents and did not recommend huge cuts to sports, music (with the exception of band), or art.

However K-3 and 9th grade class size reduction was not as fortunate. Group 2 will increase class sizes for Kindergarten to 21 and Grades 1-3 and 9 to almost 25. Group 5 reductions will increase all these class sizes to 28 (except Grades 1&9).

Negotiations with the represented staff will need to take place before all of the reductions can be implemented. The reduction of days for leadership, classified, and certificated staff will probably be slightly less than normal step and column increases per the certificated contract. For example a teacher with 5 years of experience without a master’s degree is scheduled to get a 3.2% raise next year. The reduction of three staff development days will reduce their total pay by 1.6%. Even with reductions, staff will get a modest increase.

Draft Budget Reductions for 2009/2010 School Year

Group 1
Leadership Position $137,020
Teachers on Special Assignment for Schools under 600 $38,800
AP at High School – Temporary Transfer to Facilities $130,575
Expand Team Cleaning $56,329
Economic Impact Aide Teacher (ELD) $75,000
TV TIP Reduction $40,567
Reduction in Certificated Substitute Rates $30,000
Reduction in Classified Substitute Rates $10,000
Athletic Program Reduction $30,000
4th Grade Band $80,662
Group 1 Total $628,953

Group 2
One Staff Development Day $148,000
Reduction of One Day (Leadership) $17,000
Reduction of One Day (Classified) $25,000
Library Media Aides at all schools – 4 hours $171,838
Class Size Modification (K<21, 1-3<25) $300,000
Class Size Modification – (9th grade <25) $90,000
Group 2 Total $751,838

Group 3
One Staff Development Day $148,000
Reduction of One Day (Leadership) $17,000
Reduction of One Day (Classified) $25,000
Counselors Grades 6-8 (At Risk) $62,457
Group 3 Total $252,457

Group 4
Staff Development Day $148,000
One Reduction of One Day (Leadership) $17,000
Reduction of One Day (Classified) $25,000
Group 4 Total $190,000

Group 5
Elimination of Kindergarten CSR- 537 students Class to 28 $287,63
Elimination of Third Grade CSR- 497 students Class to 28 $266,143
Elimination of Second Grade CSR- 501 students Class to 28 $266,143
Group 5 Total $819,921

Grand Total $2,643,169

The draft proposal may use $870,000 of the recently approved Parcel Tax to fund the annual shortfall in funding for class size reduction and $200,000 for other programs.

The primary issue is the District’s lack of gaining knowledge from the budget reduction process last year. Many parents were bothered by the lack of transparency in the process. The closure of Nielsen led to several complaints about DUSDs handling of the issue; concerns were raised about the rollout of a plan without much opportunity to consider any other options.

A similar process is being used this year. The District provided the five Board members with the above recommendations last Friday. They did not post the recommendations for public viewing until late Monday afternoon (for a meeting the next evening). Several Board members had expressed concern regarding not having enough time to consider the budget cuts if they did not receive the recommendations until the day before the meeting. Apparently, the parents and many other members of our community do not require this extra time.

Most of the Board members have expressed issues with communication with the community and many of the newly elected members made campaign promises to not repeat the issues with the Nielsen closure last year.

DUSD will point out that they met the letter of the law for noticing of a “special meeting” (only 24 hour posting is required). The reduction in normal meeting posting is for information that is quickly changing and where it would be difficult to make the 72-hour requirements. In this case the District was able to provide the information on Friday, except to the public. I was led to believe that the District was planning to improve communications.

  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Ping.fm
  • FriendFeed
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • Print
  • email
  • JohnLDUSD
    WHY AREN'T YOU GUYS TALKING ABOUT THE NEGATIVE IMPACT ABOUT TO HIT DUBLIN SCHOOLS DUE TO THE STATE BUDGET CUTS???

    Here's the deal. The state passed a tentative budget PLAN in February. In order for it to work, a bipartisan effort created 6 education and/or general fund-related ballot initiatives for a special election on May 19th. These initiatives are briefly stated as:

    1A - Adds Budget spending caps and makes a rainy day fund to be developed during good times. Prevents future adds to spending when times are good.

    1B - Billions of dollars already owed education from recent Prop 98 take-aways will be paid back first from this rainy day fund when it starts to fill up. IB does not exist without 1A.

    1C - $5B will be borrowed from future lottery funds. If this does not pass, there is a $5B hole in the education budget.

    1D - Temporarily redirects tobacco tax money from children 1-5 programs toward the state's general fund to fill gaps created by sending money to vital programs like education.

    1E - Temporarily redirects money from mental health programs to help close the budget gap.

    1F - Bars pay raises for government leaders in budget deficit years.

    To balance the budget the state (Arnold and the legislature) has created these balancing inititatives. Republicans, Democrats, Independents, Arnold, Education leaders like Alameda County Supt. of Schools, California Secretary of Education Glen Thomas, most local education officials, and more all say these ballots must pass or our local schools will be hit harder than anytime in history. Even though different sides of the aisle have some reservations about one or two of them the above mentioned leaders feel it more important to get through this difficult period.

    If we don't pass them with a simple majority? The state budget falls apart. Dublin teachers get laid off. Dublin Programs shut down. Class sizes grow. Understand that this does not come from local district spending problems or lack of cuts already. We've already cut millions this past year and will still have to cut millions over the next year or two - even with these ballots passing.

    What can you do? Join efforts to pass the ballots via phone banking and other grassroots events between now and May 19th. Stand side-by-side with teachers, and truckers, execs and parents, city and school board officials, and many others to pass these ballots. Its time for all of us to work for the kids future. Interested? Send me an email and I'll plug you into the process. WIll you help?

    John Ledahl
    Trustee, DUSD
    LedahlJohn@Dublin.k12.ca.us
    925-551-5965
  • JohnLDUSD
    SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET PLAN APPROVED.

    Last night the school board approved the budget plan for both the remainder of 2008/09 and 2009/10.

    It is important to understand that it is a dynamic, working plan that will likely change between now and final approval of the budget in June. Things still uncertain include conclusion of the final state budget, which is dependent on federal stimulus money. It isn't over by a long shot, folks. Any questions, email me or Dr. Hanke at the district.

    John B. Ledahl
    Dublin School Board
    ledahljohn@dublin.k12.ca.us

  • JohnLDUSD
    You know Dan, the reason the information was not released to the public on Friday is that it was expected to change, AND IT DID!! And after tonights Work Study session it will likely change again. It is still incomplete. Changes were made and placed in the release of information yesterday, Monday. As I've said to you in the past, it is wrong to put out incomplete or inaccurate information if you can help it. Of course, mistakes will be made, but not on purpose. Once again I ask you to check your facts with the district before you get people excited. There is enough bad news here that necessary alarm is not warranted.

    Equally important is that the meeting tonight is a work study session with plenty of opportunity for public input built into the process. Staff has held 2 community townhall meetings, 2 Financial Advisory Committee meetings, and a number of board meetings or workshops every week since January 1st. They took the time to do it right without alarming people about what might not happen. Final decisions will be made next Tuesday, the 10th. This work study will give everyone the chance to understand the impact on every program and school in the district. Isn't that a good thing, a good way to communicate a week in advance? Will you concede that? Please bring it up at the work study meeting.

    John B. Ledahl
  • Dan_Cherrier
    John,

    With both know this is an evolving process, and the final adopted budget might be changed considerably. However, that does not change the fact that information was provided to the Board several days before it was provided to the public. That is not implementing the "better communication" that the District has committed to. Board members are supposed to be deliberating this information in open session with public input. If it takes several extra days for the Board members to absorb the information, then it will probably take the community just as long.

    Dan
  • JohnLDUSD
    Sometimes people would rather be perceived as right than concede an inch. The information passed to the board was INCOMPLETE. It was meant to give the board a headstart while realizing it was not complete. Staff needed the weekend and Monday to finalize things. You are a prime example of someone who will jump all over an issue if it is incorrect. Is this how you would how behaved if you were elected to the school board. Ready, Fire, Aim?

    John B. Ledahl
  • Dan_Cherrier
    I take issue with how incomplete the information was that was relayed to you on Friday. As we are both members of the Financial Advisory Committee, each of us was provided with a draft copy of the proposed changes to the budget, four days before on Tuesday. The published draft version that came out after your Board version on Friday was very close to the draft package a week earlier. Most of the changes were in Group 5. As you know, we were requested to keep the list confidential until after it was published by the District. I had hoped to make several positive comments about the process over this past weekend and deliver an opinion that the District may be finally becoming more open in dealing with the community. However, in order to keep the requested confidence, I was forced to wait until Monday night and came to the realization that it is business as usual.

    While we are on the subject of the recent campaign, I issued three campaign goals. The first of which was to improve communication between the District and the community. I have not backed off that idea and will continue to insist that the District no longer makes important decisions before meeting in open session. The community deserves to be informed as information is obtained, not after the District takes weeks to formulate a recommendation and just share it with the public shortly before a decision is rendered.

    Dan Cherrier
  • JohnLDUSD
    Bottom line is that the package sent to the board was confidential in nature. It contained information from a personnel and legal perspective that is not for public consumption - by education code and the Brown Act. Due to this fact the confidential package was for trustee eyes only. Mr. Cherrier, you are not a trustee. End of story.

    From a communications perspective, the district held two town hall meetings, two Budget Advisory Committee meetings, a website survey and numerous announcements, and board related work studies and meetings - held every week since the first of the year. We have communicated well around this issue and people like you need to recognize the hard work.
  • JohnLDUSD
    Dan,

    My general goal here in my replies is to support the blog's good efforts and kill myths that still abound in our town, while sharing school district information. SInce you neither showed up for the work study session (packed house) last night nor responded to my last posts, I will address two other issues.

    * You continually attack the board for our handling of the Nielsen closure. I agree to some degree. I have said numerous times publicly that when the possibility of a school closure first came up from recommendations from a district optimization committee (in 2005 I believe), that the district should have had more neighborhood meetings. However, we did meet with the staffs and PFCs of both targeted schools. And the District optimization committee had experienced, knowledgeable representation from Nielsen parents. So it was not done in a vacuum as you imply. When the decision was made last year it was a matter of taking a previous board decision to close Nielsen that had been tabled (yet made with all the appropriate studies and community interactions done in advance), and implementing it. I don't think you are saying we made the wrong decision (especially since it enabled us to keep over $350K in districtwide programs and teachers), you are saying we didn't involve the community last year - yet we did. We will never get those neighbors to agree it was the right thing to close that school.

    * The last issue to address is the board mailout sent last Friday that you feel was deceptive. I've explained in a previous post that by Education Code (law) we had to keep it confidential as it contained personnel and potential legal concerns. It is clear to me that someone shared the fact that this confidential mailout went out. Only board members and key staff knew of its existence and are bound by law and board policy to keep their mouths shut. WHO told you about it? What did they share with you? I don't want the district to incur potential legals costs fighting those injured parties who were damaged by your knowledge of something that was none of your business. Your turn to be open and honest. The public has a right to know who you talked to.
  • JohnLDUSD
    I guess Mr. Cherrier's lack of response to my questions reflects on his accuracy in everything he says.
  • Dan_Cherrier
    Hi John,

    The District is planning to use parent contributions on the revenue side. However, they are worried about equity. They feel the program should be returned equally at all schools. Therefore, in this approach you should expect the money to shared among all schools.

    Dan Cherrier
blog comments powered by Disqus